Skip to article

Your Neighbors on the Same Peninsula Pay Below the State Average. UPPCO Customers Pay the Most of Any Regulated Utility in Michigan.

Researched and drafted with AI tools. Reviewed and approved by editor Keegan O’Brien. Spot an error?

Portage Lake on the Keweenaw Waterway in Michigan. Photo by Doc Searls, CC BY 2.0.
UPPCO cites replacing the underwater cable beneath the Portage Canal among the costs behind its request. Photo: Doc Searls (CC BY 2.0), via Wikimedia Commons.

A household using 500 kilowatt hours a month pays $144.95 in Upper Peninsula Power Company territory. UPPCO has asked the state for permission to charge $166.12.

The usual explanation for U.P. electric bills is geography. Long lines, few customers, hard winters. The state’s own rate table does not support it.

Two utilities, one peninsula, very different bills

The Michigan Public Service Commission publishes a comparison of average residential rates across the utilities it regulates. On the table effective August 1, 2026, at 500 kilowatt hours a month:

UPPCO charges 28.99 cents per kilowatt hour. The all-utility average is 21.17 cents. Consumers Energy and DTE both sit below UPPCO. So does Alpena Power.

And so do the two utilities operating as UMERC, at roughly 18.5 and 18.1 cents on the same table. UMERC serves the Upper Peninsula. Same weather, same distances, same thin population, rates below the statewide average.

Whatever is driving UPPCO’s number, the peninsula itself is not it.

One number worth being careful with

Houghton, Michigan and the Portage Lake Lift Bridge. Photo by Wolpodzilla, public domain.
Houghton is one of ten counties in UPPCO territory, which covers roughly 4,460 square miles and about 52,000 customers. Photo: Wolpodzilla (public domain), via Wikimedia Commons.

The figure that circulates locally is 32.24 cents, and it is real, but it is the rate at 250 kilowatt hours a month. Every bill carries a fixed monthly customer charge, and at low usage that charge spreads across fewer kilowatt hours and inflates the per unit number for everyone.

The 500 kilowatt hour column is the fairer comparison, and UPPCO still sits well above the field there. The gap is real without the extra help.

Two related claims do not hold up. “Highest in the country” is unverified and we found no primary source ranking UPPCO nationally. “Highest in the U.P.” also fails, because the member-regulated cooperatives, Cloverland and Ontonagon County REA, are not in the MPSC table at all and cannot be compared from it. What is supportable is narrower: highest among Michigan’s rate-regulated investor-owned utilities, at every residential usage tier on the August 2026 table.

What UPPCO is asking for

The company filed Case No. U-22032 with the MPSC on May 22, 2026. Residential at 500 kilowatt hours goes from $144.95 to $166.12, an increase of $21.18 or 14.16 percent. Small commercial at 2,500 kilowatt hours goes from $726.06 to $835.94, up 15.13 percent.

Shoreline at Twin Lakes State Park in Houghton County, Michigan. Photo by Yinan Chen, public domain.
Twin Lakes State Park in Houghton County. The MPSC has ten months from the May 22 filing to rule. Photo: Yinan Chen (public domain), via Wikimedia Commons.

UPPCO serves roughly 52,000 customers across about 4,460 square miles in ten counties. It cites purchased power, vegetation management, new substations, replacing the underwater cable beneath the Portage Canal, and hydroelectric dam work.

The MPSC has ten months from filing to decide, which puts a ruling around March 2027.

What you can actually do about it

Rate cases take public comment, and the docket number is the key to all of it. Case U-22032 is searchable in the MPSC’s E-Dockets system, where the filings, the schedule and the comment instructions all live. Comments from customers are part of the record.

The Michigan Attorney General has intervened in previous UPPCO rate cases. Intervention and public comment are different things, and a customer comment does not require a lawyer.

Separately, if the current bill is the problem rather than the future one, UPPCO runs a program it calls EASE, a two year payment plan for eligible customers. The Michigan Energy Assistance Program and State Emergency Relief also cover heating and electric costs for households that qualify, and both open ahead of winter rather than during it.

Yooper Hub community

The conversation

Know something this story missed? Corrections and additions get read by an editor and folded into the article, with credit.

Real neighbors, real names. A Yooper Hub editor reads your first comment before it appears; after that you’re a known neighbor and your comments post right away. No account required. Community guidelines

2 comments

  1. You’re comparing apples to oranges. UMERC generates its own power using RICE engines. UPPCO buys power off of the MISO grid. UMERC is able to keep costs lower because they are generating their own power. UPPCO is subject to the market price of power at any given time.

  2. Fair point, and the piece should have said more about it. UMERC’s RICE plants in Negaunee Township and Baraga Township cover a share of its load and the rest still comes off MISO, same as UPPCO. The rate gap is real either way, but you are right that the reason is generation mix, not management. We will add a line.

Join the conversation

First comments are read by an editor before they appear.

Sources, credits, and reporting details

Sources & accountability

How this story was reported

Editorial methodAggregation

Last verifiedSep. 9, 2026

Corrections statusNo material correction note is recorded on this article.

AI assistanceResearched and drafted with AI tools. Reviewed and approved by editor Keegan O’Brien.

Verification note: Ledger establishes MPSC Case No. U-22032 (UPPCO application filed May 22 2026, ~$17.3M base-rate increase, prehearing June 25 2026, Attorney General on the service list), the company's stated bill impacts ($144.95 to $166.12 at 500 kWh, +14.16%; $726.06 to $835.94 at 2,500 kWh, +15.13%), the MPSC Comparison of Average Rates effective Aug 1 2026 (UPPCO 32.24 cents at 250 kWh and 28.99 at 500 kWh, highest of the eight investor-owned utilities at every tier; UMERC 18.50 and 18.13 at 500 kWh; all-utility average 21.17 at 500 kWh), and MEAP/SER. Sept 9 2026: the UMERC figures and the filing date were corrected in the copy to match the MPSC table and notice. The article deliberately does not claim 'highest in the country' or 'highest in the U.P.' (cooperatives are not on the MPSC table).

Primary sources

  1. Notice of Hearing, Case No. U-22032 (Upper Peninsula Power Company), May 26, 2026 — Michigan Public Service Commission

    Published May. 26, 2026. Accessed Sep. 9, 2026.

    Supports: UPPCO filed Case No. U-22032 with the MPSC seeking an approximately $17.3 million base-rate revenue increase, with a prehearing June 25, 2026 and public comments accepted by email to LARA-MPSC-edockets@michigan.gov referencing the case number.

    Notice states the application was filed May 22, 2026; article corrected to May 22 on Sept 9 2026. Does not contain the residential bill figures.

  2. Comparison of Average Rates (in cents per kWh) for MPSC-Regulated Electric Utilities in Michigan, effective August 1, 2026 — Michigan Public Service Commission, Regulated Energy Division

    Published Aug. 1, 2026. Accessed Sep. 9, 2026.

    Supports: On the Aug. 1, 2026 table UPPCO residential is 32.24¢/kWh at 250 kWh and 28.99¢ at 500 kWh, UMERC is 20.71¢/20.83¢ at 250 kWh (18.50¢/18.13¢ at 500 kWh), the investor-owned average is 23.31¢ at 250 kWh and 21.17¢ at 500 kWh, and UPPCO is highest of the eight listed investor-owned utilities at every residential tier; no cooperatives appear.

    Utilities on the table: Alpena Power, Consumers Energy, DTE Electric, AEP (I&M), Northern States Power, Upper Peninsula Power, UMERC (formerly WEPCO), UMERC (formerly WPSC). Consumers 25.35¢ and DTE 24.35¢ at 500 kWh.

  3. MPSC Staff's Notice of Withdrawal of Attorney Appearance, Case No. U-22032 — Michigan Public Service Commission E-Dockets

    Published Jul. 24, 2026. Accessed Sep. 9, 2026.

    Supports: Case U-22032 is live in the MPSC E-Dockets system, and the Michigan Attorney General (Michael E. Moody, Chris Bzdok) appears on the service list as a party.

    Supports the article's 'searchable in the MPSC's E-Dockets system' and AG involvement; the article's claim is about previous UPPCO cases, this shows the AG is on this one too.

  4. 2026 Rate Review — Upper Peninsula Power Company

    Published May. 23, 2026. Accessed Sep. 9, 2026.

    Supports: UPPCO says a residential customer at 500 kWh goes from $144.95 to $166.12 (+$21.18, 14.16%), small commercial at 2,500 kWh from $726.06 to $835.94 (+15.13%); it serves about 52,000 customers over 4,460 square miles in 10 counties; costs cited include purchased power, vegetation management, two new substations, the Portage Canal underwater crossing replacement and hydro dam work; EASE offers two-year payment plans; MPSC has 10 months to review.

    Company release; the specific bill figures do not appear in the MPSC notice.

  5. Michigan Energy Assistance Program (MEAP) — Michigan Public Service Commission

    Accessed Sep. 9, 2026.

    Supports: MEAP, administered by the MPSC, provides payment assistance for electricity, natural gas, propane, heating oil and other heating fuels to eligible low-income households.

    Page notes funding 'beginning the September 2026 billing month'; does not state an application season.

  6. State Emergency Relief: Heat & Utilities — Michigan Department of Health and Human Services

    Accessed Sep. 9, 2026.

    Supports: State Emergency Relief offers temporary heat and utility assistance to eligible low-income households when heating or electric service has been or will be shut off.

    Only the page meta-description was retrievable; full program text not captured.

Photo and media credits

  1. Portage Lake on the Keweenaw Waterway, Michigan.jpg (featured image) — Doc Searls, via Wikimedia Commons

    Featured image record. Published Sep. 1, 2010. Accessed Sep. 9, 2026. CC BY 2.0.

    Supports: Featured image caption on the article: 'UPPCO cites replacing the underwater cable beneath the Portage Canal among the costs behind its request. Photo: Doc Searls (CC BY 2.0), via Wikimedia Commons.'

    Commons file identified Sept 9 2026 via the Commons API from the author credit and matching aspect ratio.

Corrections policyReport a correction or missing credit

Get The Daily Stamp in your inbox each morning.

Joining...

You are on the list. The next Daily Stamp lands in your inbox tomorrow morning.